Discussion:
[Bug 781446] New: rtsp: Add support for the new RTSP 2.0 protocol (rfc7826)
"GStreamer" (GNOME Bugzilla)
2017-04-18 11:34:09 UTC
Permalink
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=781446

Bug ID: 781446
Summary: rtsp: Add support for the new RTSP 2.0 protocol
(rfc7826)
Classification: Platform
Product: GStreamer
Version: 1.x
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: Normal
Component: gst-plugins-good
Assignee: gstreamer-***@lists.freedesktop.org
Reporter: ***@gnome.org
QA Contact: gstreamer-***@lists.freedesktop.org
GNOME version: ---

Currently our RTSP stack only supports RTSP 1.X (RFC 2326) which has been
obsoleted by the version 2.0 of the protocol[0]. We should implement support
for the new version. It is not backward compatible but it is most probably
possible to add support for it in our current implementation, it has to be
tried though.

[0] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7826
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
"GStreamer" (GNOME Bugzilla)
2017-04-18 11:40:17 UTC
Permalink
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=781446

Tim-Philipp Müller <***@zen.co.uk> changed:

What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |***@zen.co.uk
Severity|normal |enhancement
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
"GStreamer" (GNOME Bugzilla)
2017-07-05 15:26:57 UTC
Permalink
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=781446

Thibault Saunier <***@gnome.org> changed:

What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |***@gnome.org
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
"GStreamer" (GNOME Bugzilla)
2017-07-05 15:27:03 UTC
Permalink
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=781446

--- Comment #1 from Thibault Saunier <***@gnome.org> ---
Created attachment 354929
--> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=354929&action=edit
rtsp: Start implementing support RTSP 2.0

Properly handle protocol version in the connection

Add the following headers types:
* Pipelined-Request
* Media-Properties
* Seek-Style
* Accept-Ranges
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
"GStreamer" (GNOME Bugzilla)
2017-07-05 15:28:09 UTC
Permalink
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=781446

--- Comment #2 from Thibault Saunier <***@gnome.org> ---
Created attachment 354930
--> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=354930&action=edit
rtsp: Start implementing support for RTSP 2.0

- Handle version negotation:

Added a `default-version` property so that the user can configure
what to use in case the server does not support version negotation
(which actually exist)

- Handle pipelined requests, which allow avoiding full round trip to
setup the RTP streams (request are sent in a raw, and response are
handled as they arrive).

- Handle the new Media-Properties header

- Handle the new Seek-Style header

- Handle the new Accept-Ranges header

Handling of IPV6 should already be OK.

We are still missing (at least) the following features (which do not
seem really mandatory as they require a "persistent connection between
server and client"):

- Server to Client TEARDOWN command (Not so usefull fmpov)
- PLAY_NOTIFY (not needed for our server yet)
- Support for the new REDIRECT features

and probably some more protocol changes might not be handled yet.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
"GStreamer" (GNOME Bugzilla)
2017-07-05 15:28:45 UTC
Permalink
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=781446

--- Comment #3 from Thibault Saunier <***@gnome.org> ---
Created attachment 354931
--> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=354931&action=edit
Start support for RTSP 2.0

This adds basic support for new 2.0 features, though the protocol is
subposdely backward incompatible, most semantics are the sames.

This commit adds:

- features:
* version negotiation
* pipelined requests support
* Media-Properties support
* Accept-Ranges support

- APIs:
* gst_rtsp_media_seekable

The RTSP methods that have been removed when using 2.0 now return
BAD_REQUEST.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
"GStreamer" (GNOME Bugzilla)
2017-07-05 15:29:37 UTC
Permalink
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=781446

Thibault Saunier <***@gnome.org> changed:

What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #354930|0 |1
is obsolete| |

--- Comment #4 from Thibault Saunier <***@gnome.org> ---
Created attachment 354932
--> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=354932&action=edit
rtsp: Start implementing support for RTSP 2.0

- Handle version negotation:

Added a `default-version` property so that the user can configure
what to use in case the server does not support version negotation
(which actually exist)

- Handle pipelined requests, which allow avoiding full round trip to
setup the RTP streams (request are sent in a raw, and response are
handled as they arrive).

- Handle the new Media-Properties header

- Handle the new Seek-Style header

- Handle the new Accept-Ranges header

Handling of IPV6 should already be OK.

We are still missing (at least) the following features (which do not
seem really mandatory as they require a "persistent connection between
server and client"):

- Server to Client TEARDOWN command (Not so usefull fmpov)
- PLAY_NOTIFY (not needed for our server yet)
- Support for the new REDIRECT features

and probably some more protocol changes might not be handled yet.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
"GStreamer" (GNOME Bugzilla)
2017-07-05 15:30:38 UTC
Permalink
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=781446

--- Comment #5 from Thibault Saunier <***@gnome.org> ---
Created attachment 354933
--> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=354933&action=edit
validate: launcher: Add an option to run the testsuite with RTSP 2.0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
"GStreamer" (GNOME Bugzilla)
2017-07-05 15:45:25 UTC
Permalink
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=781446

Thibault Saunier <***@gnome.org> changed:

What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |***@ocrete.ca

--- Comment #6 from Thibault Saunier <***@gnome.org> ---
This first set of patches implements basic support for RTSP 2.0, I might still
be missing some semantic changes, but overall it should be quite compliant with
the new version of the standard.

This is the first RTSP 2.0 implementation (I asked protocol authors and this is
the answer I got from them!) so I developed both the server and the client at
the same time.

As stated in the commit messages it is still missing some features, but those
should not be really important for a start. Also support for extensions has not
been implemented for the simple reason there is not real extension defined yet
(afaict).

Those patches are to be applied in the different GStreamer repositories as
follow:

* 354929: gst-plugins-base
* 354932: gst-plugins-good
* 354931: gst-rtsp-server
* 354933: gst-devtools

I am also mantaining up to date branches on the following repositories:

* https://github.com/thiblahute/gst-plugins-base/commits/rtsp2.0
* https://github.com/thiblahute/gst-plugins-good/commits/rtsp2.0
* https://github.com/thiblahute/gst-rtsp-server/commits/rtsp2.0
* https://github.com/thiblahute/gst-devtools/commits/rtsp2.0

Extra care has been taken to make sure to not break 1.0 support, and a
-validate testsuite has been previously added, no regression has been found
(yet:)).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
"GStreamer" (GNOME Bugzilla)
2017-07-05 21:16:47 UTC
Permalink
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=781446

Mathieu Duponchelle <***@gmail.com> changed:

What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #354929|none |needs-work
status| |

--- Comment #7 from Mathieu Duponchelle <***@gmail.com> ---
Review of attachment 354929:
--> (https://bugzilla.gnome.org/review?bug=781446&attachment=354929)

Looking good, a few unrelated changes but I don't know if that matters, also
need to not forget to update the Since comments :)

::: gst-libs/gst/rtsp/gstrtspconnection.c
@@ +1661,3 @@

+ if (rversion != GST_RTSP_VERSION_1_0 &&
+ rversion != GST_RTSP_VERSION_2_0 && rversion !=
GST_RTSP_VERSION_2_0)

Hm, don't you mean 1_1 instead of one of the two 2_0 ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
"GStreamer" (GNOME Bugzilla)
2017-07-05 21:55:16 UTC
Permalink
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=781446

Julien Isorce <***@gmail.com> changed:

What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |***@gmail.com
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
"GStreamer" (GNOME Bugzilla)
2017-07-06 02:05:38 UTC
Permalink
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=781446

Hyunjun Ko <***@igalia.com> changed:

What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |***@igalia.com
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
"GStreamer" (GNOME Bugzilla)
2017-07-06 17:29:52 UTC
Permalink
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=781446

--- Comment #8 from Olivier Crête <***@ocrete.ca> ---
Review of attachment 354933:
--> (https://bugzilla.gnome.org/review?bug=781446&attachment=354933)

Would it be possible to run both RTSP 1.0 and RTSP 2.0 in the test suite when
just running gst-validate-launcher ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
"GStreamer" (GNOME Bugzilla)
2017-07-06 17:37:03 UTC
Permalink
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=781446

--- Comment #9 from Thibault Saunier <***@gnome.org> ---
(In reply to Olivier Crête from comment #8)
Post by "GStreamer" (GNOME Bugzilla)
Would it be possible to run both RTSP 1.0 and RTSP 2.0 in the test suite
when just running gst-validate-launcher ?
It sure is indeed, both pass all the time here.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
"GStreamer" (GNOME Bugzilla)
2017-07-06 17:44:16 UTC
Permalink
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=781446

Olivier Crête <***@ocrete.ca> changed:

What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #354932|none |reviewed
status| |

--- Comment #10 from Olivier Crête <***@ocrete.ca> ---
Review of attachment 354932:
--> (https://bugzilla.gnome.org/review?bug=781446&attachment=354932)

The Random-Access features handling seems to be a bit incomplete, a casual
glance at the RFC sounds like they have added a lot of different modes!

Otherwise looks good to me

::: gst/rtsp/gstrtspsrc.c
@@ +2513,3 @@
+ if (seekable) {
+ if (src->seekable > 0.0) {
+ start = src->last_pos - src->seekable * GST_SECOND;

Why would start not be 0 ? I understand that this "seekable" value is the
maximum distance between two keyframes, no ?

Should the value be used here be for Time-Duration? Then you also want
segment_end to be src->last_pos + src->time_duration ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
"GStreamer" (GNOME Bugzilla)
2017-07-06 17:46:27 UTC
Permalink
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=781446

Olivier Crête <***@ocrete.ca> changed:

What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #354931|none |reviewed
status| |

--- Comment #11 from Olivier Crête <***@ocrete.ca> ---
Review of attachment 354931:
--> (https://bugzilla.gnome.org/review?bug=781446&attachment=354931)

Generally looks good, just one little nit related to the one on the rtspsrc
patch about the seeking stuff.

::: gst/rtsp-server/rtsp-media.c
@@ +127,2 @@
gboolean is_live;
+ GstClockTimeDiff seekable;

Is this really a time diff? The current mode seems to only have -1, 0 and
MAXINT ? So like a 3 flags enum? Reading from the spec, this should really be
the worse inter-iframe distance (which we can't query in Gst right now). I dont
think we have ways to query information about modes like "live + recording"
from update elements, I guess ideally we'd add more data to the seeking query
for this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
"GStreamer" (GNOME Bugzilla)
2017-07-06 17:50:56 UTC
Permalink
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=781446

--- Comment #12 from Thibault Saunier <***@gnome.org> ---
Review of attachment 354932:
--> (https://bugzilla.gnome.org/review?bug=781446&attachment=354932)
The Random-Access features handling seems to be a bit incomplete, a casual glance at the RFC sounds like they have added a lot of different modes!
I tried (and think managed) to synthesis all features related to the seeking
possiblities in the seekable field, now, as our sever is not able to do live
retention I am probably missing a few features there indeed.

::: gst/rtsp/gstrtspsrc.c
@@ +2513,3 @@
+ if (seekable) {
+ if (src->seekable > 0.0) {
+ start = src->last_pos - src->seekable * GST_SECOND;

The seekable value is defined in gst_rtsp_media_seekable as follow:

Returns: -1 if the stream is not seekable, 0 if seekable only to the beginning
and > 0 to indicate the longest duration between any two random access points.
G_MAXINT64 means any value is possible.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
"GStreamer" (GNOME Bugzilla)
2017-07-09 02:03:31 UTC
Permalink
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=781446

Olivier Crête <***@ocrete.ca> changed:

What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #354932|reviewed |needs-work
status| |

--- Comment #13 from Olivier Crête <***@ocrete.ca> ---
Review of attachment 354932:
--> (https://bugzilla.gnome.org/review?bug=781446&attachment=354932)

::: gst/rtsp/gstrtspsrc.c
@@ +2513,3 @@
+ if (seekable) {
+ if (src->seekable > 0.0) {
+ start = src->last_pos - src->seekable * GST_SECOND;

so, according to that logic, in this case, it shoudl do start=0, just it
shouldnt have the ACCURATE flag on. Even if seekable is 10, Gstreamer should be
able to seek all the way to time 0.. whil putting the segment_start and
segment_end to anything else than 0 and duration means that you can't sek
outside of that range.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
"GStreamer" (GNOME Bugzilla)
2017-07-09 14:07:58 UTC
Permalink
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=781446

--- Comment #14 from Thibault Saunier <***@gnome.org> ---
Review of attachment 354932:
--> (https://bugzilla.gnome.org/review?bug=781446&attachment=354932)

::: gst/rtsp/gstrtspsrc.c
@@ +2513,3 @@
+ if (seekable) {
+ if (src->seekable > 0.0) {
+ start = src->last_pos - src->seekable * GST_SECOND;

I guess you mean if seekable == 0. If it is > 0, user can basically seek
wherever he wants.

In the case seekable == 0, I consider the seek query should let the user know,
and it is represented in the following branch with start=0 and duration=0,
maybe this is not the right way though, I am not sure.

I mean in practice if the user seeks to 1hr, he does not want to seek to 0,
which is afaiu what you are proposing here.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
"GStreamer" (GNOME Bugzilla)
2017-07-09 16:39:35 UTC
Permalink
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=781446

--- Comment #15 from Olivier Crête <***@ocrete.ca> ---
Review of attachment 354932:
--> (https://bugzilla.gnome.org/review?bug=781446&attachment=354932)

::: gst/rtsp/gstrtspsrc.c
@@ +2513,3 @@
+ if (seekable) {
+ if (src->seekable > 0.0) {
+ start = src->last_pos - src->seekable * GST_SECOND;

Unless I misunderstand the seeking query, the values passed to the last two
parameters of gst_query_set_seeking () are the start and end position to which
seeking is possible? So if you where to return "10, 20", a seek to 5 or to 25
should fail (but to 10, 15 or 20 should work).

As a side-note, we need better documentation for the gst_query_*_seeking()
parameters.

The ==0 case is fine, it's the other one I'm worried about.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
"GStreamer" (GNOME Bugzilla)
2017-07-09 20:51:43 UTC
Permalink
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=781446

--- Comment #16 from Thibault Saunier <***@gnome.org> ---
Review of attachment 354932:
--> (https://bugzilla.gnome.org/review?bug=781446&attachment=354932)

::: gst/rtsp/gstrtspsrc.c
@@ +2513,3 @@
+ if (seekable) {
+ if (src->seekable > 0.0) {
+ start = src->last_pos - src->seekable * GST_SECOND;

Sorry, I misinterpreted you previous comment.

The idea here is to make sure that we handle the case where the server is able
to do live retention, that formula is wrong now (I changed the meaning of
seekable during dev and looks like I did not fix it properly), I think the
computation should now be:

start = (src->seekable == G_MAXINT64) ? 0 : src->last_pos - src->seekable;

Also what you explain here is racy and I think we need the seek to clamp to the
start position in the case we have a running window of possible seeking time
(not totally related to that issue though).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
"GStreamer" (GNOME Bugzilla)
2017-07-09 20:56:13 UTC
Permalink
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=781446

Thibault Saunier <***@gnome.org> changed:

What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #354932|needs-work |none
status| |
Attachment #354932|0 |1
is obsolete| |

--- Comment #17 from Thibault Saunier <***@gnome.org> ---
Created attachment 355229
--> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=355229&action=edit
rtsp: Start implementing support for RTSP 2.0

Fix seek query start result computation.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
"GStreamer" (GNOME Bugzilla)
2017-07-09 20:57:51 UTC
Permalink
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=781446

Thibault Saunier <***@gnome.org> changed:

What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #355229|0 |1
is obsolete| |

--- Comment #18 from Thibault Saunier <***@gnome.org> ---
Created attachment 355230
--> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=355230&action=edit
rtsp: Start implementing support for RTSP 2.0

Fix seek query start result computation.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
"GStreamer" (GNOME Bugzilla)
2017-07-13 18:51:58 UTC
Permalink
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=781446

--- Comment #19 from Thibault Saunier <***@gnome.org> ---
Created attachment 355547
--> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=355547&action=edit
rtspsrc: Handle TCP as lower transport with RTSP 2.0

Meaning that the interleave fields have to be updated as
if streams setup was working when using pipelined setup
request. Otherwise there is a mismatch between the server
channel count and our own.

This also makes RTSP 2.0 over HTTP working.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
"GStreamer" (GNOME Bugzilla)
2017-08-10 11:52:06 UTC
Permalink
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=781446

andy <***@qq.com> changed:

What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |***@qq.com

--- Comment #20 from andy <***@qq.com> ---
Dear Thibault Sunier. I download your project and complie in the ubuntu 14.04.
I find I can't complie it, because of autogen.sh not work. Can you give me some
advice?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
"GStreamer" (GNOME Bugzilla)
2017-08-10 13:25:59 UTC
Permalink
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=781446

--- Comment #21 from Thibault Saunier <***@gnome.org> ---
Anyone willing to review more? Anything you want me to do to get the ball
rolling?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
"GStreamer" (GNOME Bugzilla)
2017-08-12 15:17:47 UTC
Permalink
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=781446

--- Comment #22 from andy <***@qq.com> ---
Can you give a cient to test rtsp 2.0?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
"GStreamer" (GNOME Bugzilla)
2017-08-16 19:55:05 UTC
Permalink
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=781446

Thibault Saunier <***@gnome.org> changed:

What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #354931|reviewed |none
status| |
Attachment #354931|0 |1
is obsolete| |

--- Comment #27 from Thibault Saunier <***@gnome.org> ---
Created attachment 357758
--> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=357758&action=edit
(rtsp-server) - Start support for RTSP 2.0

Since V1:
- Rebase
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
"GStreamer" (GNOME Bugzilla)
2017-08-16 19:34:15 UTC
Permalink
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=781446

Thibault Saunier <***@gnome.org> changed:

What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #354929|needs-work |none
status| |
Attachment #354929|0 |1
is obsolete| |

--- Comment #23 from Thibault Saunier <***@gnome.org> ---
Created attachment 357749
--> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=357749&action=edit
(-base) rtsp: Start implementing support RTSP 2.0

Since V1:
- Fixed s/RTSP_2_0/RTSP_1_1/ typo
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
"GStreamer" (GNOME Bugzilla)
2017-08-16 19:48:42 UTC
Permalink
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=781446

Thibault Saunier <***@gnome.org> changed:

What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #354933|0 |1
is obsolete| |

--- Comment #26 from Thibault Saunier <***@gnome.org> ---
Created attachment 357754
--> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=357754&action=edit
validate: launcher: Run rtsp tests against both V1 and V2

Since V1:
- Always run tests against both RTSP 1.X and 2.X
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
"GStreamer" (GNOME Bugzilla)
2017-08-16 19:44:14 UTC
Permalink
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=781446

Thibault Saunier <***@gnome.org> changed:

What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #355230|0 |1
is obsolete| |

--- Comment #24 from Thibault Saunier <***@gnome.org> ---
Created attachment 357751
--> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=357751&action=edit
(-good) rtsp: Start implementing support for RTSP 2.0

Since V1:
- rebase
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
"GStreamer" (GNOME Bugzilla)
2017-08-16 19:46:40 UTC
Permalink
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=781446

Thibault Saunier <***@gnome.org> changed:

What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #355547|0 |1
is obsolete| |

--- Comment #25 from Thibault Saunier <***@gnome.org> ---
Created attachment 357752
--> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=357752&action=edit
(-good) - rtspsrc: Handle TCP as lower transport with RTSP 2.0

Since V1:
- Rebase
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
"GStreamer" (GNOME Bugzilla)
2017-10-05 16:34:44 UTC
Permalink
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=781446

Thibault Saunier <***@gnome.org> changed:

What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #357749|none |committed
status| |
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
"GStreamer" (GNOME Bugzilla)
2017-10-05 16:35:59 UTC
Permalink
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=781446

Thibault Saunier <***@gnome.org> changed:

What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #357752|none |committed
status| |
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
"GStreamer" (GNOME Bugzilla)
2017-10-05 16:36:04 UTC
Permalink
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=781446

Thibault Saunier <***@gnome.org> changed:

What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #357751|none |committed
status| |
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
"GStreamer" (GNOME Bugzilla)
2017-10-05 16:37:12 UTC
Permalink
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=781446

Thibault Saunier <***@gnome.org> changed:

What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #357754|none |committed
status| |

--- Comment #28 from Thibault Saunier <***@gnome.org> ---
Comment on attachment 357754
--> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=357754
validate: launcher: Run rtsp tests against both V1 and V2

Attachment 357754 pushed as 4fac7bf - validate: launcher: Run rtsp tests
against both V1 and V2
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
"GStreamer" (GNOME Bugzilla)
2017-10-05 16:38:31 UTC
Permalink
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=781446

Thibault Saunier <***@gnome.org> changed:

What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #357758|none |committed
status| |
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
"GStreamer" (GNOME Bugzilla)
2017-10-05 16:38:27 UTC
Permalink
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=781446

Thibault Saunier <***@gnome.org> changed:

What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
"GStreamer" (GNOME Bugzilla)
2017-10-05 16:39:39 UTC
Permalink
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=781446

Thibault Saunier <***@gnome.org> changed:

What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|git master |1.13.1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
Loading...